dirkf
dirkf
Yes, so I think this patch should be applied to treat the first failure in the routine in the same way as the later cases: ```diff --- old/youtube-dl/youtube_dl/extractor/youtube.py +++ new/youtube-dl/youtube_dl/extractor/youtube.py...
Such cases should be resolved in the same way, if they occur: (a) if the 429 will prevent extraction it should be an error; (b) if not it should be...
Yes, that was my point. The issue could be left open until I push the change (actually there's a slicker version now).
Well, #23638 applies. In this case the JSON contains streaming formats but they only contain encrypted media links ("signature cipher"). The extractor needs the `player_url` to resolve these; that URL...
1. Use the template. 2. Follow #30839 (point 1 again, but more details). 3. As suggested there, provide verbose logs showing your issue with the actual _youtube-dl_ program (or some...
@GeorgeSinclair0043 ?
This is true though not what "broken site support" was intended to mean. There's no point downloading that version anyway: the court is actually doing you a favour. When a...
You don't want to do that. See above.
Even if a version was released with all site extractors passing their tests, the turnover of site issues would invalidate the release after a few days. For now, the nightly...
https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl/issues/32495#issuecomment-1666729299