Daniel Holbert
Daniel Holbert
Is `min-height:min-content` supposed to work (i.e. be treated as the content-height) for elements inside of a block? (I think it is, based on https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3973#issuecomment-705663905 and surrounding comments.) If so, *and*...
If I'm not misunderstanding anything in my previous comment here, then I think I'd prefer that we have these `min-content`/`max-content` keywords consistently prevent sizes from being definite. I think we...
> I don't disagree with (c), I just don't understand its relevance. Point (c) was intended as support for why it makes sense to keep `min-height:auto` in a separate category...
Yeah, so the compat situation here (per fantasai's "test results" comment) seems to be that Firefox, Chromium, WebKit, and pre-Chromium Edge all directly implement the Flexbox normative prose (determining the...
@tabatkins , one thing I'm confused about in [your analysis](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1026183636) -- you say: > So the flex base size is 100px (from the transferred width), and the automatic minimum size...
For completeness, I'll point out that browsers also agree that the div in the other example here (the row-oriented flex container that [@davidsgrogan asked about](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1026190182)) does indeed have a 100px...
@bfgeek aha, thank you for clarifying that. I had forgotten that aspect-ratio had its own special `min-width:auto` behavior even with no flex/grid involvement. ~OK - with that clarification, I think...
[retracting my "things make sense" comment] So per @bfgeek 's example and comments, it sounds like the min-content size of an element with `aspect-ratio` and an opposite-axis size is defined...
Yeah, this seems like a reasonable way to address this. Minor nitpick: right now, this issue's added text (in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#last-remembered ) is worded as follows: > At the time that...
(Repeating what I said about this proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7596#issuecomment-1217477264 when this was initially proposed as part of that issue): I like this idea in theory (i.e. I like the idea...