David Chambers

Thanks for sharing your experience, @maciejmiklas, and welcome to the community! :wave: I suggest watching [Programming Safely in an Uncertain World][1], then solving the [challenge][2] yourself, with vanilla JavaScript and...

This issue is related to sanctuary-js/sanctuary-def#300.

We're (slowly) working towards converting the many Sanctuary projects to ES modules, @stken2050. :) Would you like to help us with the migration?

I think so, @masaeedu, given the strictness of [`S.prop`][1]. In fact, using `S.prop` would simplify the definitions of `view` and `update`. [1]: https://sanctuary.js.org/#prop

We needn't move flunc/optics to the @sanctuary-js namespace, though if you would *like* to do this, @scott-christopher, I'd be very happy for you to do so. I could not at...

@protoEvangelion and @coodoo, lenses will be the next major addition to Sanctuary. As it may be of interest, I will share the backstory. In order to define [van Laarhoven lenses][1],...

Thank you very much for your feedback, @tycho01. :clap: > binary `fantasy-land` methods lack currying None of the methods specified by Fantasy Land is curried, so I believe this to...

> > This is faithful to Sanctuary's behaviour. > > That's what one might assume looking at the Ramda docs as well. Sanctuary has no notion of "array-like" objects: ```javascript...

> Interested party here. Any ETA on a merge? Any specific help needed? Thank you for taking an interest, @miangraham, and for submitting a helpful pull request. I don't know...

> Feel free to add me and I can try pushing a few things your way over the weekend. Excellent! Feel free to push to this branch. Please don't `--force`...