David Bar-On

This is probably the same Cygwin issue with parallel UDP streams fixed by PR #1163 which is not (yet?) part of iperf3 mainline. Can you test the code branch from...

Seems I had to explain better the changes for `-p` in PR #1163. On the Windows side (the server in this case), the `-p` also specifies the **number of ports...

@mochazi, did you compile and used for the server the iperf3 from PR #1163? I am asking, sine this PR code is based on version 3.10.1 and you are using...

Deleting. Will send a PR with changes instead.

Per iprf3 code, the iperf3 packets data is already randomized using "_/dev/urandom_". However, each message (packet) includes the same contents. I wrote the data into a file using iperf3 `-F`...

Submitted PR #1907 with proposed solution - allow to send blocks with different randomized data in each (up to certain limit and then repeating the blocks).

Submitted PR #1778 with a suggested multi-CPUs Affinity support.

@manedurphy I see that you already got a response to your PR and that it maybe that both yours and this PR will not be used. Your proposal is interesting....

@gryphon2411, I submitted PR #1843 that adds support for a UDP control socket, so no UDP should be used. It will be useful if you can test this PR and...

In my local computer I see the same problem using iperf3 version 3.7, but it doesn't exist when I am using 3.10.