David Bar-On

@zokl the approach of this patch can help to allow the client to reconnect while the old connection is still active on the server. However, this will be a new...

@DorChen, it seems that other proxy solutions should be used to support UDP. E.g. see this [StackOverflow discussion](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31255780/udp-traffic-with-iperf-for-haproxy). @sraillard, yust for information. Are you using stickiness to make sure that...

The tcpdumps info (which is very useful) shows that the client successfully sent on the control stream (TCP) the cookie (seq 1:38) and the parameters (seq 42-140) and that the...

Hi @NicoEspla, it seems that ptp4l cause some side effects on the server's machine, although it is terminated. I am not sure what they may be, but few suggestion to...

@Genericreqd, 1. Does the problem happen also for TCP tests, i.e. when you run the client **without** the `-u` option? 2. Can you run PTP4l **without** canceling it before running...

@ankitg12, I reply to your [comment](https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues/812#issuecomment-1375325969) here, as building the change is using the code of this PR. >Any idea when this change would be merged ? Or how I...

> .... I had to add `#define HAVE_TCP_KEEPALIVE 1` in `./iperf/src/iperf_config` .... @lbsou, `configure.h` is generated by `./iperf3/configure` per `./iperf3/configure.ac`. Currently, `configure.ac` defines `HAVE_TCP_KEEPALIVE` is defined in `confugure.h` when **`netinet/tcp.h`...

Hi, thanks for the info! Hopefully I now understand the problem. When (if...) the PR will be merged into the mainline, `autoconf` and `autoheader` will be run to updated the...

@lbsou, I have updated the PR description. Thanks for your efforts and time for clarifying this issue (and helping me to better understand the configuration process ...). I am not...

Hi @lbsou, thanks for testing and finding this issue. Actually, setting the keepalive only on the client side was intentional, and just the help for the option wrongly showed it...