Dave Verwer

Re-opening as we had another error overnight

[#83 - Abort.500: http://spi-prod-docs.s3-website.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/swiftgen/swiftgen/blob/6.2.1/Documentation/SwiftGenKit Contexts/MigrationGuide.md is an invalid URL](https://rollbar.com/finestructure/SPI-server/items/83) It's a space problem again with `SwiftGenKit Contexts` but I can't find that path anywhere in the README ([raw version here](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SwiftGen/SwiftGen/stable/README.md)...

> I don't think we have much of a chance finding the source unless we adding more detail to the logs. The one bit of information that'd help us track...

> on the internet, anyone can do anything to a publicly-accessible service, and i have learned this the hard way myself. Both Sven and I are very well aware of...

That's good to know Kelvin, thanks for the apology and the explanation.

Soemthing I notice straight away is that the tree view of dependent packages would also need to show if a package was test-only.

> One thing that keeps tripping me up when talking about dependencies is the bi-directional use of "depend" in "dependency/dependent package". I always need to think for a moment which...

Just pinging #1610 here as there was useful discussion related to this in https://github.com/SwiftPackageIndex/SwiftPackageIndex-Server/pull/1606#issue-1159576993 and https://github.com/SwiftPackageIndex/SwiftPackageIndex-Server/pull/1606#issuecomment-1060747909.

> `development` _is_ `staging` That's my point. It's odd to me that those two environments are the same. In previous projects I have created/worked on there have been four environments...

Closing this. As part of #1793 we need to bring the latest stable release into the score calculation.