Datner

Just crashed into this, thanks for opening this issue

If I understand correctly, following down the line, merging this PR will allow in turn `vite` to correctly resolve the following: ```ts // ComponentA.tsx export const ComponentA = () =>...

@patroza how about you help me make this blog post cooler if you're already here?

@mikearnaldi ? 😄

But it looks really lame 🥲

@MrOxMasTer there is no "ideology of `.tap*` functions", `Effect.tap`-- and only it, no extrapolations, has the same usage ergonomics like `Effect.andThen` has, just with its take-left semantics. This is so...

@MrOxMasTer > I can change the number of errors You cannot. It will be only 1 or 0. A union is not an array. What you accumulate is the type...

Any updates on this?

Should we really promote skipping handling an `Exit` like that when the alternative is to opt-into an `Option` / `Either` instead of an exit to begin with? 🤔

whats `runExit`? @jessekelly881 I think this would cover your case fine tbh ```ts const val = Effect.runSync(Effect.option(effect)) // const val = await Effect.runPromise(Effect.option(effect)) return Option.getOrUnderfined(val) ```