cvat Fix quality computation for tasks with skeletons and normal labels

Motivation and context

Fixed quality report computation in tasks with non-skeleton labels after skeleton labels

How has this been tested?

Unit tests

Checklist

[ ] I submit my changes into the develop branch
[ ] I have created a changelog fragment
[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes
[ ] I have linked related issues (see GitHub docs)
[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary (cvat-canvas, cvat-core, cvat-data and cvat-ui)

License

[ ] I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes
- Improved quality computation for tasks with both skeletons and normal labels in the Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT).
Tests
- Added a new test to ensure quality can be computed correctly when a non-skeleton label follows a skeleton label.

Jun 28 '24 15:06 zhiltsov-max

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This update enhances the quality computation in the Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) by addressing how tasks with skeleton and normal labels are managed. A new parameter, label_id_mapper, was introduced to refine the confusion matrix creation and shape matching processes. Additionally, a test was added to verify the quality computation when labels transition from skeleton to non-skeleton.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`cvat/apps/quality_control/quality_reports.py`	Introduced `label_id_mapper` parameter in `_make_zero_confusion_matrix` and modified its usage in `_find_closest_unmatched_shape`.
`tests/python/rest_api/test_quality_control.py`	Added `test_can_compute_quality_if_non_skeleton_label_follows_skeleton_label` to verify quality computation scenarios.

Poem

In the fields where labels dance, A mapper joined for clearer chance. Shapes aligned with mindful grace, A test to see if quality’s place. Skeletons and labels, side by side, Now in harmony, they glide. 🌟🛠️

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
- @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Jun 28 '24 15:06 coderabbitai[bot]

@coderabbitai review

Jun 28 '24 15:06 zhiltsov-max

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Jun 28 '24 15:06 coderabbitai[bot]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 83.64%. Comparing base (6d49b89) to head (ab1a977). Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #8100   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    83.63%   83.64%           
========================================
  Files          383      383           
  Lines        40503    40507    +4     
  Branches      3831     3830    -1     
========================================
+ Hits         33876    33881    +5     
+ Misses        6627     6626    -1