Attila Mészáros

it should sry, deleted.

> It seems to me that all this could be handled with appropriate pre-conditions Actually I'm not sure, the problem is if a precondition not holds the resource is deleted,...

Just to clarify, I don't necessary mean to implement this now. We should gather some feedback, see more cases that not fit. And see if those could be fixed by...

One sample, what this would fix more nicely is discussed here: https://github.com/java-operator-sdk/java-operator-sdk/discussions/1732#discussioncomment-4767670

Not sure how the user would then update the status, based on the results of the flow after the second workflow. Was thinking on other variants also, like having a...

Typically this would be useful also to set some default values as discussed here: https://discordapp.com/channels/723455000604573736/723455000604573739/1201920896080543824

Note that this is little bit more cumbersome for cleanup, if `Cleaner` interface is not implemented probably should be called implicitly even the flag is there (when not all dependents...

I wonder if this is not misleading. ` context.managedDependentResourceContext().invokeWorkflow();` Maybe should be: `context.managedWorkflowContext().invokeWorkflow()`

Hi @itroyano , thx we will take a look on it. @metacosm this seems to me more like a QOSDK issue, maybe consider move it under that repo.

Hi @coltmcnealy-lh thx for the bug report, will have to take a look how to solves this in a generic way. If you could provide an a simplified project to...