Michal

Oh, that's a reaction to #5. It's about splitting `html:a` to `html:anch` and `html:link`.

@OscarGodson is there anything you don't agree with? :) Actually, writing specifications began to be a good fun for me, so I'm ready to correct it.

It could be this way: `` for hyperlink to another page `` for anchor (but maybe it's too long, `anch` or `a` could be enough) `` for scripts and style...

And what about removing `html:a` completely - leaving just `href` or `html:href` attributes would be great. Even W3C was trying to do this in their [XHTML2](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML#XHTML_2.0). Less tags, less writing.

These I like the most (Is that word order correct?): https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13958 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15229 (form api) https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16899 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18165 (I would do this using src tag inside `html:media`, it would be also great...

My opinion: `` - could be `` - dirty

`type=""` was an example, it means `type="last"` and other possible types. But ``, meant as close last element (as a SHORTTAG in SGML def), would be great for one-line not-nested...

1,2) For one-liners, as Joel said, its clear and easy to understand. Example: ``` Ahoj, jak se máš? Hola, ¿qué tal? Sum borin text hier ``` 3) Can you explain...

3) Why do you use `` in your example? It would be easier (cleaner, more user- and parser-friendly) to write the real name of elements you are closing and make...

@philandy Ok but you could just use DOM createElement in your "dynamic" example. I think it would be even faster. @OscarGodson Yeah :)