Cristian Trifan

@lwiseman I don't think this is likely to change. The library defaults other options like that as well - include, ignore etc. You might want to use `copy` option instead.

@manishkrai Here's an example of what you need to do to have your code working. The idea is to define the `copy` option in the right place. ``` js var...

@aupp @GChernikov Although this issue is quite old I'm willing to fix it if still around. If possible please provide a jsfiddle or a test. I tried with the version...

@grofit When it comes to plugins this is getting tricky. To get the dependency chain right `peerDependencies` must be used instead of asking the developer to install `knockout` separately. From...

Thanks for the details. If I were to agree on using 2 instances of KO in (i.e.) nodejs then `ko.hasPrototype` would need to change to use a string based type...

To make the items in the array observable you may use mapping options: ``` js vm = ko.mapping.fromJS(data, { items: { create: function(options) { return ko.observable(options.data); } } }); ```...

It would be great to have that feature.

thanks @miltonhit. I'm currently using some of that in my fork.

Try using [ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines](https://github.com/kriskowal/es5-shim). IE's bad support on ES5 usually causes this type of issues. Apart from that, does this show up after building...

@tjyrkinen If time permits please take a look at SteveSanderson#176 (see above). It will help a lot in moving forward and getting close to v3.0. Thanks.