Christoph Ortner

I guess that as a workaround, I can pass in a separate work array for each thread, but how would people feelabout just allocating a separate array for each thread...

for the record, I'm happy to make a PR, especially since I was the one introducing the pre-allocation of the `wrk` array :); but would be good to get feedback...

no worries at all, I understand :) - not in industry but still busy.... TBH, I'm not sure. the allocating approach will be much easier to maintain of course. Yet...

I should also admit that I just switched my main code to Interpolations, but I might still use Dierckx in the future when I need the fitting. So from my...

maybe somebody wants to fork it? I would have made 2-3 PRs already, but seeing that none of the existing ones are being accepted and my questions in the Issues...

I've only used `latextools` since I switched to Atom, but does anybody here have experience with the other latex packages for Atom? How do they compare re functionality?

Fwiw I suggested making 2-3 minor changes (5-10 lines) in a few issues but never even got a response. I appreciate people can get busy but just abandoning a project...

@r-stein fair point about the org and package-name in general. But also can we please give @shanepelletier a break. Whether his judgement was perfect or not, I think it is...

is anything happening about continuing this `atom-latextools`?

Too bad