podman.io_old icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
podman.io_old copied to clipboard

Open source / free software nature not prominently advertised

Open Chealer opened this issue 4 years ago • 9 comments

According to What is Podman?, Podman is open source, unlike its competitor Docker. If this is exact, this should be prominent and indicated somehow on Podman's homepage, presumably in its second paragraph (Podman description). This could be as simple as describing Podman as "open source", "free software", "FLOSS" or "FOSS", or mentioning its license.

Chealer avatar Aug 31 '21 20:08 Chealer

Please open a PR, how you would like the description to show.

rhatdan avatar Sep 01 '21 14:09 rhatdan

@rhatdan can you clarify what you mean by "PR"?

Chealer avatar Sep 23 '21 22:09 Chealer

@Chealer in @rhatdan speak, PR == Pull Request

TomSweeneyRedHat avatar Sep 24 '21 15:09 TomSweeneyRedHat

Thanks @TomSweeneyRedHat

If we are asked to "open" a merge request, we do not have any branch (let alone any change) solving this.

Chealer avatar Sep 29 '21 20:09 Chealer

@mairin here's one for your design work. I tried to assign it to you, but GitHub wouldn't hear of it.

TomSweeneyRedHat avatar Dec 04 '21 18:12 TomSweeneyRedHat

@TomSweeneyRedHat Ah I think the trick is if I comment it'll let you assign to me. Let's see if it works!

mairin avatar Dec 06 '21 17:12 mairin

Looks to be the case @mairin , it's all yours now and thanks!

TomSweeneyRedHat avatar Dec 06 '21 19:12 TomSweeneyRedHat

@Chealer I have some WIP mockups for a new podman.io front page and features pages, and I would love your feedback on whether or not you feel they address highlighting Podman's open source nature.

Here is the first page... I added by the latest stable version number under the main call-to-action buttons in the hero banner that the license is Apache 2.0: Screenshot from 2021-12-06 14-22-06

On the features page, I have the first sentence of the main description as "Podman is an open source container, pod, and container image management engine." Screenshot from 2021-12-06 14-22-14

Let me know what you think, if these work or if you have better ideas.

mairin avatar Dec 06 '21 19:12 mairin

Thank you very much @mairin I will not comment on the Features page proposal, but the homepage revamp looks quite promising. Considering that some may not know about the Apache license (which is not quite as known as - say - the GPL), I would argue that the proposed homepage mention is fairly subtle. But even adding a subtle advertisement on the homepage surely largely increases prominence, and I for one would consider this issue solved if that proposal is implemented.

Chealer avatar Dec 09 '21 23:12 Chealer