Specification of Rhino version during installation

[tomvanmele]

trafficstars

Attempt to simplify the installation process and return more meaningful error feedback to the user...

What type of change is this?

• [ ] Bug fix in a backwards-compatible manner.
• [ ] New feature in a backwards-compatible manner.
• [ ] Breaking change: bug fix or new feature that involve incompatible API changes.
• [ ] Other (e.g. doc update, configuration, etc)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• [ ] I added a line to the CHANGELOG.md file in the Unreleased section under the most fitting heading (e.g. Added, Changed, Removed).
• [ ] I ran all tests on my computer and it's all green (i.e. invoke test).
• [ ] I ran lint on my computer and there are no errors (i.e. invoke lint).
• [ ] I added new functions/classes and made them available on a second-level import, e.g. compas.datastructures.Mesh.
• [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• [ ] I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

[tomvanmele]

@gonzalocasas @Licini @chenkasirer not sure if you get a notification if i submit as draft...

[gonzalocasas]

@gonzalocasas @Licini @chenkasirer not sure if you get a notification if i submit as draft...

Yep, got one!

I was thinking about this, would it be possible to install to all available rhinos by default instead of trying to figure out which rhino it is that the user wants? Installing to a single specific one then would be the task of passing the -v ARGS

[tomvanmele]

yes that should be possible