dbt-sqlite

dbt-sqlite copied to clipboard

As mentioned in this [comment](https://github.com/codeforkjeff/dbt-sqlite/issues/43#issuecomment-1593119063) on #43, I have fixed the `setup.py` to use `dbt-core~=1.4`.

EloiSanchez

upgrade to support dbt-core v1.5.0

2

## Background The latest version of dbt Core,`dbt-core==1.5.0rc1`, was published on April 13, 2023 ([PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/dbt-core/1.5.0rc1/) | [Github](https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/releases/tag/v1.5.0rc1)). ## How to upgrade https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/discussions/7213 is an open discussion with more detailed information....

dataders

## Background The latest version of dbt Core,`dbt-core==1.4.0`, was published on January 25, 2023 ([PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/dbt-core/1.4.0/) | [Github](https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/releases/tag/v1.4.0)). In fact, a patch, `dbt-core==1.4.1` ([PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/dbt-core/1.4.1/) | [Github](https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/releases/tag/v1.4.1)), was also released on the...

dataders

Since using SQLite is always going to be local, we can (mis)use dbt's python models to run code, probably in a subprocess.

codeforkjeff

- I needed to make some empirical adjustments; added comments for discussion - I referenced [this](https://til.simonwillison.net/sqlite/unix-timestamp-milliseconds-sqlite) as a resource to handle the partial seconds for datepart in ['second', 'millisecond']. This...

tom-juntunen

add minimum compatibility for 1.6.0

2

Per the adapter maintainer upgrade [guide](https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/discussions/7958) for v1.6.0, this PR includes the following: ### **Bugs fixed:** - Fixed a bug causing the dateadd macro to fail its tests when handling...

tom-juntunen

vergenzt