Chris Karcher

@asztal - any word on the CLA?

@hobby203 - I'm happy to submit a new PR if you're tired of messing with this. I've got backports of this PR to the `15.x` branch (#3573) and `16.x` (#3576)...

> if everyone is happy with that I think it will be the best course of action. No problem! I'll go ahead and submit that new PR (giving credit to...

A clone of this PR has been submitted as #3651. @saihaj @IvanGoncharov - can you please look at [@hobby203's comment above](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-js/pull/3529#issuecomment-1158934485) that gives their blessing for this PR to be...

@saihaj - any idea on the expected turnaround time to get a review from the reviewers group?

@saihaj @n1ru4l - looks like we may have the approvals necessary to merge this, but I myself don't have right to merge. Are either of you able to merge it?

@n1ru4l - apologies for continuing to pester you about this, but does your 👍 on my message mean that you'll take care of merging this? And if so, do you...

> I think we need someone from the foundation to verify that the cla workaround here is viable @yaacovCR - is there anything I can do to help with that...

@benjie - curious if there are any updates on the convo you raised with the TSC?

> I think your options are either to do a clean re-implementation of it (where you reimplement the fix without referencing the previous code) OK - thanks, @benjie. I'll submit...