Chris Papademetrious

Results 212 comments of Chris Papademetrious

@raducoravu - this is a good point about the intent of the OASIS DITA specification for `action="passthrough"`. I posted the following to "dita-comment" to get some thoughts: [dita-comment: questions about...

My preference is to treat the group name as the effective attribute name when constructing the HTML5 attribute name: ```html KEEP (attribute group) ``` This has the following advantages: 1....

The current matching behavior for groups is as follows (demonstrated with `action="flag"`): ![Picture1](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe472053-9450-4515-a2bd-2b368253cad2) Per [section 2.4.3.1](http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata02/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/archSpec/base/usage-of-conditional-processing-attributes.html ) of the DITA v1.3 specification, > If both grouped values and ungrouped values...

Testcase: [4098.zip](https://github.com/dita-ot/dita-ot/files/10355435/4098.zip) To run: `dita --project project.xml --verbose` `keyref` processing behavior: ![4098](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/50950969/210872936-6842359c-9add-4920-9c39-da0afbedf01a.svg) Interestingly, there are no "unresolved key" messages issued, perhaps because the key definitions are still found (despite the...

@chrizzbee - maybe you could change the issue title to something like "Nested key references are not resolved in map elements" to better describe the underlying cause?

I am not sure how `KeyrefModule` works, but I wonder if somehow it could detect when a key definition references a not-yet-known key, and somehow requeue the file to the...

@chrizzbee - @jelovirt is probably the only developer in the project with the Java expertise to figure this out. I did rerun the testcase with DITA-OT 4.3 to confirm that...

I have used Oxygen Feedback's comment feature a number of times, and I am quite fond of it. It is great for clarifying uncertainties right at the point where the...

@jelovirt - would this be an easy fix for the next release? We were hoping to use the recent attribute-group passthrough enhancements together with a specialized profiling attribute. Edit: I...