Chris Sewell

> Or do you suggest we add to this PR an exclusion of the needs in post_process_needs_data ? > Ahh okay, then I have misunderstood the concept. But the current...

> But if you change or remove a Need object in File A, needtables and co do not get updated in File B. if doesn't already, there is no reason...

> So in the end, a full-build is needed. but yeh obviously this is a more broad topic that I want to look into It should also be noted that...

One thing else I note @danwos: I see now that the `duration` and `completion` fields are added for use by the `needgantt` directive. For this there are also `needs_duration_option` and...

Heya, so I definitely have thoughts on this 😉 I wanted to start though, by base-lining how the needs data is actually generated/used internally within the extension. As you know,...

Heya, if you want to check out #1125, as an improvement to the current situation (that doesn't require too much back-breaking)

> Any way: it is cool that the needs.json has the same structure as the internal. Heya, The problem is that there is no structure 😅 The information stored in...

> we do need name spaces even in rst. And i belive this is verbose for the author of a rst file. This is not the case, the data is...

Happy to talk offline with you about this @PhilipPartsch In the mean time you may want to check out https://github.com/useblocks/sphinx-needs/blob/64ce426fa60543b388196a349bbf1d4d99d15c86/sphinx_needs/data.py#L80 which I painstakingly deciphered from the current code 😅 My...

I added releases for the last few versions: https://github.com/useblocks/sphinx-needs/releases Is this what you are after?