Chris Sewell

> rabid 🐕 😆 🤦‍♂️

> Pandoc https://pandoc.org/try/?params=%7B%22text%22%3A%22%60%60%60a+b%5Cncontent%5Cn%60%60%60%5Cn%5Cn%3A%3A%3Aa+b%5Cncontent%5Cn%3A%3A%3A%22%2C%22to%22%3A%22json%22%2C%22from%22%3A%22markdown%22%2C%22standalone%22%3Afalse%2C%22embed-resources%22%3Afalse%2C%22table-of-contents%22%3Afalse%2C%22number-sections%22%3Afalse%2C%22citeproc%22%3Afalse%2C%22html-math-method%22%3A%22plain%22%2C%22wrap%22%3A%22auto%22%2C%22highlight-style%22%3Anull%2C%22files%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22template%22%3Anull%7D > This is the way it has always behaved, and changing it now is probably not a good idea Does djot have to do what pandoc does...

It seems like Pandoc does not follow commonmark here 🤔 https://spec.commonmark.org/0.30/#info-string

> Part of the motivation here is to avoid confusing inline code that happens to start at the beginning of the line and uses three backticks with a code block....

> With jupyterlab-myst being the canonical way to write a MyST notebook in JupyterLab > I took a look at their extension API and it looks like it might be...

> It's worth noting here. My understanding is that we want to collectively standardise the various parts of MyST / JB so that we can collectively avoid divergences. yep exactly,...

> As I understand it, the aspect to standardise here is the output metadata. No I'd say, if `eval` can change the state of the kernel, then its more involved...

> Er, that too! Exactly! It is no-doubt is a great feature to have but, and really quite simple to hack it into a jupyter client (you are just calling...

> make it a feature flag, and then ask for feedback from others and iterate from there. Yep then main is that feature flags/config give you a clear hook for...

+1 I'd note that restructured text has the similar: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#field-lists ```restructuredtext :Date: 2001-08-16 :Version: 1 :Indentation: Since the field marker may be quite long, the second and subsequent lines of...