Chris Sewell

Oh and I also want to cc in to this discussion @mgeier who (as I mention in my original proposal) has been working on https://insipid-sphinx-theme.readthedocs.io

We can add it in the new tips and tricks section 😄

> Maybe we can start by just encouraging "thumbs up" on executablebooks/ repositories and then see how that goes? Yep, I think we should maybe then have a separate `feature`...

> For the "alternative discussion forum", I think an easy step could be to create a category in the jupyter community forum for this. Cool, do you want to create...

> do you think we should call it jupyter-book? executable-books? executable-books IMO

> Upvoting: These issues+upvotes are then counted autonomously and output into a table somewhere Check out https://jsfiddle.net/chrisjsewell/xjw5623y/

> I wonder if we could just embed that in a page with some nice-looking CSS and have that be it? Yep that was the thinking > Though we'll probably...

Nah I've already checked ([returning-a-calls-rate-limit-status](https://developer.github.com/v4/guides/resource-limitations/#returning-a-calls-rate-limit-status)) its cost=1 per request. FYI the authentication is now set up on @ebp-bot, who also has the email [email protected] which may be of use 😄...

Just found out about the coming [GitHub Discussions](https://github.blog/2020-05-06-new-from-satellite-2020-github-codespaces-github-discussions-securing-code-in-private-repositories-and-more/#discussions), seems like they will be a better alternative to discourse (in terms of integration), although I'm sure @choldgraf will not be happy...

I have requested we be added to the GitHub Discussions beta: https://github.community/t/can-one-apply-for-github-discussions-beta/121120/34?u=chrisjsewell