Chris Burr

I would expect the "schema" (or whatever it's called) of the index to be incorrect?

There is another bug than https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/pull/7340 that result might not be a dict for `if result["Status"] != 0:`

> I gather it's only meant to be used for user tokens, and the code seems to work fine without it. My current inclination would be to install the DB...

I hadn't considered that would even be a possibility. For bits with non-trivial DIRAC semantics (`S_OK`/`S_ERROR`/`CFG`/`executeRPC`/`dict`) we'll need hand crafted types (like https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/pull/6309) but for the long tail of "easy"...

More things that might be useful for DiracX: - [x] Remove setup from index name: done in https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/pull/7292 - [x] Remove `elastic` and the `.0` from index name: done in...

> My question is the following. How to write a custom python script that use DIRAC API and that may be distributed with a job to be executed during userjob...

See also https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRACOS2/pull/108 and https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb-dirac/LHCbDIRAC/-/merge_requests/1401

LHCb was also ticketed: https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=162429

This commit feels fishy but I can't quite persuade myself what the problem is: https://github.com/DIRACGrid/WebAppDIRAC/commit/5370787871affb13eae26ef3ed454d910556159e Does it go away if you restart the webapp?

The aim of this issue isn't to summarise everything in DIRAC. During the last BiLD tokens were already being used in EGI in a few places. Please can you summarise...