Chitrang Patel
Chitrang Patel
> If we want to be consice, couldn't we use `name` for this instead adding `url` and duplicating some information (the name) ? I think it would be backward compatible...
> If we want to be consice, couldn't we use `name` for this instead adding `url` and duplicating some information (the name) ? I think it would be backward compatible...
/hold cancel
/retest
cc @lcarva @renzodavid9
@renzodavid9 please add any other items here that I may have missed.
The way it was designed was such that for an `inlined Step`, you don't need `step results` since an inlined Step is in the direct body (i.e. not referenced) of...
Ah I see. So you want to pass a param value which is a result of a previous step. There is no way to reference the Task result in another...
Right now when we cancel the pipelineRun, we update the Condition of the PipelineRun Status and mark it as cancelled. At the same time, we submit patch for the Child...
/assign @renzodavid9