Chewxy

Sorry... my internet at home was giving me a lot of grief. Turns out our national broadband network cannot really support a majority of people working from home at the...

I like this idea - we should `Op` this - I'm not sure if we should make it generic, though you still have to write the backprop functions for each...

Ugh and this is why you don't refactor at 3am. `values` `types` and `shapes` should be moved to `internal`

Updated your comment to turn it into a todolist. I love all the suggestions. If possible, we could even create a struct such that #60 could be tied in.

I'm not too sure of what the best API would work best for the return . The function signature may also want to use `...` for optional `one`

YES!. This has been in the plans for ages. See also: [github.com/gorgonia/randomkit](https://github.com/gorgonia/randomkit). The fancy URL is "gorgonia.org/randomkit" I haven't had the time to do so tho. If you put a...

This looks like a version issue

I don't understand the question. Do you mean if you don't want to use pjreddie's weights, and want to train your own? Yes you can do that. @LdDl wrote the...

here's a tip: ``` func FilterVar(ns G.Nodes) (retVal G.Nodes){ for _, n := range ns{ if n.IsVar(){ retVal = append(retVal, n) } } return retVal } ``` Then you can...

I have updated the issue for formatting. Investigating now exactly to see what happens.