Chandler Carruth

Closing explorer-specific issues as not-planned for now due to our decision to prioritize working on the toolchain over other implementation work in the near term: https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/proposals/p3532.md

My initial idea here is that the answer should be "no", but maybe even more than suggested above: maybe it should be an error to declare a function with a...

> An alternative to consider: the type of the return value has the same phase as the return type expression. So if it is dependent on a template parameter, it...

I think I recall this being discussed recently, with some movement towards "no" -- I wonder if you recall and could summarize any of that here @josh11b ? (Or apologies...

I don't have any problems with the direction of #1122. For me, the issue is that while #1122 provides a very nice way to address the technical challenges of extension...

Adding a bit more nuance and precision after a discussion with @zygoloid here... The set of scopes where we should allow `me` parameters are the same set of scopes which...

FWIW, I like focusing on these two high level options. I actually think they are *both* based on fairly proven approaches that have found to be accessible and popular in...

Adding a comment here to just clarify where my opinion came from ... The only part of option "B" that really bothers me is that the identifier looks like an...

Just to leave a note here that the leads are explicitly deferring this question and #505 . We're not opposed to named parameters and arguments, but the initial motivation for...

Closing explorer-specific issues as not-planned for now due to our decision to prioritize working on the toolchain over other implementation work in the near term: https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/proposals/p3532.md