Chandler Carruth

@zygoloid - Any thoughts on my comments?

I think the core question here is whether we should move away from `addr` right now. I think this is something we should explore, and there are lots of comments...

Marking this as decided with "not right now" -- all the leads were happy with that direction as I [outline](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/issues/1750#issuecomment-1666656122).

> I also wonder if we could avoid having a special keyword for this at all, and instead model an `adapter` as a `class` with exactly one data member that...

> We've been writing 'dialog & 'color' & 'initialize' and even 'gray' for colour. Adapter is a pretty well known convention for software. Basically anything Americanised. Just to be clear,...

> In the context of #995, we've been discussing a different syntax: `class A { extend adapt B; ... }` instead of `adapter A extends B { ... }`, which...

> > > In the context of #995, we've been discussing a different syntax: `class A { extend adapt B; ... }` instead of `adapter A extends B { ......

As this was pretty heavily discussed already in the context of #995 I'm comfortable saying we have lead consensus [here](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/issues/1159#issuecomment-1504205076) and can move forward. If something about this doesn't look...

Sorry to bring this thread back to life, but we're looking at incorporating this or something like this because without it we're missing coverage. > > For example, in my...

@justzh - Please keep comments on PRs and issues constructive and on-topic. I'm hiding yours, but you've had warnings now and so I will block if this continues. Rapid-fire asking...