Mailbox constructor got queue and reply_queue TTL and Expires options

[alanjds]

New Mailbox.__init__() options: queue_ttl, queue_expires, reply_queue_ttl and reply_queue_expires

utils.maybe_s_to_ms and utils.functional.dictfilter were copied-over from Celery implementation (from actual master)

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 79.595% when pulling 1f368a5b7056a6e65576286cac9d9c2bd8b1fcea on alanjds:pidbox-ttl into 55973ddd2af143caf919472f8b7d8e13bfbf9008 on celery:3.0.

[ask]

Looks good to me!

[alanjds]

@ask: Thank you very much. Will use this branch as the base for a PR to celery yet to be coded.

[alanjds]

Just a thing: I had noticed that the tests not passing are the ones for Python 3. Is desirable to the next patches to be complaint with Python 3, probable via http://www.python-future.org/ ?

[auvipy]

you need to get this patch pass against python3 too to be accepted.

[alanjds]

Ok. Will do with python-future. Ping if this is not acceptable. Thanks

[auvipy]

python3 support is very important at the moment :) It shouldn't be that difficult for adding python3 support

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.003%) to 79.657% when pulling 51a5bbe290d4e3e8f212acac8646f75ad74accbe on alanjds:pidbox-ttl into 55973ddd2af143caf919472f8b7d8e13bfbf9008 on celery:3.0.

[alanjds]

Done :)

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.003%) to 79.657% when pulling 8ae8d85bf2bf80be7ceadea6d0ab65acf9260905 on alanjds:pidbox-ttl into 55973ddd2af143caf919472f8b7d8e13bfbf9008 on celery:3.0.

[ask]

This patch should actually be applied to master, not 3.0.

We use from kombu.five import items, iteritems is soooo Python 2. Doesn't seem like you need anything else from python-future here.

Next major version is Python 3 only so not sure changing compatibility interface is of priority.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 79.683% when pulling d008cea0c1db08ff61d303f6acfeb26c033bae20 on alanjds:pidbox-ttl into 55973ddd2af143caf919472f8b7d8e13bfbf9008 on celery:3.0.