UCR_Time_Series_Classification_Deep_Learning_Baseline icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
UCR_Time_Series_Classification_Deep_Learning_Baseline copied to clipboard

The performance of MLP is bad

Open HuangYaowei opened this issue 5 years ago • 1 comments

I have run the code twice and I find that the performance of FCN and Resnet is normal but in MLP the performance is very low. FCN

0.034404267222644426 0.8465473055839539 0.014002826408698009 0.8491048812866211

MLP

2.7152027130126952 0.21994884312152863

RESNET

9.826100923909018e-05, 0.8184143304824829

But in the paper, it is said to be good. Is there something wrong?

HuangYaowei avatar Dec 09 '19 08:12 HuangYaowei

I encountered the same problem as you, the performance of MLP is not good: loss: 2.7749 - accuracy: 0.2026

kirathes avatar Aug 22 '23 06:08 kirathes