Results 121 comments of Casper

Another advantage of Rspamd seems to be a lower resource consumption. In my setup, there was a difference of 90MB in memory usage between "SA, Amavis, SPF..." vs. "Rspamd".

Would it be possible, to implement Rspamd, the same way SA is today? I mean: Making each Rspamd service (ANTISPAM, SPF, DMARC, GREYLISTING, etc.) independent from each other to enable/disable?...

See the linked comment below: https://github.com/docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver/blob/4d8a56072a88cbacea373be88aa1d805e1eacc59/target/fail2ban/jail.local#L26-L30 PR: https://github.com/docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver/pull/3288 --- > we don't need to enable the [postfix-sasl] Are you sure? I see a lot of banned IPs in my setup...

> you'd notice that ip likely gets banned in both [postfix] and [postfix-sasl] jails I am not sure if I understand you correctly. At the moment, there are much more...

I have this in my `fail2ban-jail.cf` ``` [postfix] mode = normal ``` I am not sure if that also applies to `postfix-sasl`. `fail2ban-client -d` doesn't seem to provide the "mode"...

I can't remember, why I set `mode = normal`. I switched to `extra` now.

For the record, I am using fail2ban DMS default settings now and started from scratch (I've unbanned any IPs a week ago). This is how it looks now: ``` Banned...

I found these logs under "Output" and "shared" after the first "Download settings" action: ``` 2024-09-28 22:00:56.159 [info] Getting Manifest... nonoroazoro.syncing 2024-09-28 22:00:56.166 [info] Installing extension: nonoroazoro.syncing {"isMachineScoped":false,"installPreReleaseVersion":false,"pinned":false,"profileLocation":{"$mid":1,"external":"vscode-userdata:/c%3A/Users/foo/.vscode/extensions/extensions.json","path":"/c:/Users/foo/.vscode/extensions/extensions.json","scheme":"vscode-userdata"},"installOnlyNewlyAddedFromExtensionPack":true,"isApplicationScoped":false,"productVersion":{"version":"1.93.1","date":"2024-09-11T17:20:05.685Z"}} 2024-09-28 22:00:56.631...

I can confirm what OP says. If we want to change that behaviour, we could add `umask 027` to the `setup` script. That would effect any `setup` command. Or we...

If we add `umask` only to `addmailuser`, there should be no side-effects. The only file that is touched is `/tmp/postfix-accounts`?