Carlos Alberto Cortez

@austinlparker Wondering if the names should be updated to the latest that the Java API has (`ToTraceId()` and `ToSpanId()`) - something to consider ;)

Hey @zvuki Besides what @pavolloffay commented, I have to say we have been working on improving the documentation to explain the expected usage and behavior (preview can be seen here:...

My two cents: > IScopeManager implementation is the default in other languages, such as Java - why should it exist in a contrib package for .NET when it's the default...

Any opinion or similar on this one @yurishkuro @sjoerdtalsma ?

> the RFC currently doesn't mention the convenience accessor Tracer.activeSpan - should it be added to the RFC? I *think* this is more of sugar on top of the API,...

IHMO, the issue/PR @pavolloffay would be a nice thing to have, and would also address the point @yurishkuro made. Regarding the specification: I think we need to change/update it to...

@cwe1ss My opinion is that this would be more of an "Enhancement" - also, I'd discuss that in the Java scenario as well.

Hey @pavolloffay Wondering about your opinion on this - it *feels* like there's agreement to not add this method. Let us know ;)

So it seems we have some agreement on this - any opinion @objectiser @yurishkuro @CodingFabian ?

Hey @CodingFabian So this is more of a preventive use case, I'd say, and is not expected to be used by final users most of the time (same as `ScopeManager.active()`)....