Nemo

Could you rebase your branch against the latest commit here please? It's running quite behind and failing builds as a result.

How are you deciding the EOL Date? I tried to look it up for my `i7-8559U / skylake` and the [Product Change Notification - PCN 117916-00,](https://qdms.intel.com/dm/d.aspx/9b98580a-8071-459c-b415-39c0736ceaf4/PCN117916-00.pdf) only goes up to...

List of all "Product Discontinuance" PCNs from Intel for Desktop Processors: From https://qdms.intel.com/Portal/SearchPCNDataBase.aspx ``` https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/1E07901F-0EDC-42B2-8BA5-EC124761070D/PCN118523-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/9B5F3D86-3357-43F1-A19F-3BE8800B0A43/PCN117894-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/7F05B145-6AAC-45C1-91BD-2C72E6D86CD5/PCN117911-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/4A5A4F0E-69B7-4EF0-A7E0-87A9EA40F812/PCN117671-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/9C676E9D-27BD-4EA0-801A-9689DDCC4425/PCN117653-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/6174A63A-903B-43A0-93CE-A222ED0801F4/PCN117657-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/912E9BE3-33FA-4D44-A70A-1DB63F3F79B2/PCN117617-02.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/6EBEB58D-1D39-4B43-8A21-31A9CE0A2816/PCN117291-02.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/30CDA47D-2175-495B-8CE4-7C50A0B6877D/PCN117255-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/C94085E7-D379-4084-A24E-5B243DE525D3/PCN117180-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/84E7C41F-94FC-4B10-8A08-4997B60EEE74/PCN117021-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/7DABB08B-AD31-4B4C-914F-8CA2C94BBE6F/PCN116966-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/EED3D500-FB5C-47A2-82E1-BF8DF2E0EF11/PCN116799-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/6EB3B724-8F12-4432-9078-9D84B3F2E275/PCN116713-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/F65EEA26-13FB-4580-972B-46B75E0AB322/PCN116733-00.pdf https://QDMS.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/F81B2174-1C75-4FF0-B96B-A17AFC420095/PCN116383-05.pdf...

Hmm, I was basing it as skylake based on the output of the current versionCommand.

> Perhaps command can be to show CPU model then we have users go to Intel ark to check their architecture? This seems like a better idea.

btw, I tried to parse Intel PCNs using camelot-py, but didn't get good enough coverage.

Let's go ahead and merge it. We can note down concerns in the talk page.

If we do this, the text should reflect "Adoptium Java" (or something similar) instead of keeping the main focus on Oracle. I'm inclined to split these as well, if only...

Sounds good 👍🏽. But let's merge #397 in the interim, since we're missing EOL on a new release otherwise.

If you'd like to work on this, you will just need to edit the `products/windows.md` file. Go through a few of the previous Windows PRs: #155, #124, #101, #96. If...