c-parsons

For what it's worth, I was missing the enviroment variable `ANDROID_HOME`, which is required as is described in the [android_sdk_repository documentation](https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/be/android.html#android_sdk_repository) However, this was quite unclear given the error messages...

ugh, we have to resolve the buildifier issues or remove it as a presubmit request (or worse, manually push) I'll try to find some time today to push the fixes...

Indeed, I think we should generally apply some scrutiny to whether a new rule belongs in skylib. In general, skylib should contain "utilities to help Starlark rule writers". There's of...

I'm not quite convinced on adding a (canonical) third option for runfiles handling. If this is easier for rules_nodejs, that's one thing -- but it's another to suggest it so...

Paging @juliexxia and @gregestren :)

Golden file verification does indeed does seem like useful functionality we may want to put into bazel-skylib. For one, Stardoc tests [re-implement golden file verification from scratch](https://github.com/bazelbuild/skydoc/blob/master/test/diff_test_runner.sh), and I assume...

> What would you think of a PR as the proposal. It's nice to have a design doc but this shouldn't be extremely complex to implement and we could have...

The plan is to completely take down the skydoc.bazel.build site (it should forward to in-github documentation of this repository). I'm going to change the issue description to track this here.

Fair enough -- we can leave the **Skydoc** (python binary) portion of the site intact, with strong deprecation warnings, but take down all Stardoc-related information (with a redirection to this...

+200 I was pointed to this repository, as I'm trying to tabulate alternatives for Bazel testing frameworks. It's very unclear to me what this testing framework does, what it intends...