Feature request: async support (with aiohttp)

[eavanvalkenburg]

Steps to reproduce:

1. Use this in a async context

What should happen:

1. add async version of all calls to the API, so await Payment.async_list or something similar

What happens:

1. No support

Traceback

SDK version and environment

• Tested on 1.14.1
• [ ] Sandbox
• [x] Production

Response id

• Response id:

Extra info:

[Sadaf-A]

Hey @eavanvalkenburg , Is this still up for contribution?

[two-trick-pony-NL]

👋 Hey @eavanvalkenburg

I work at bunq and am currently reviewing the bunq API docs, open issues and SDK’s and came across your issue. I know it’s been open for a while, and I’d love to understand how it’s impacting you. Beyond the obvious -fixing this issue-, what else could we do to improve your experience with our API?

If you want to share your thoughts on how we can improve on our public API:

📅 I'd love to schedule a 15 minute interview to understand your needs through: Calendly 💬 Or if you don't have time for a call, you can give us some general feedback through this form

Your feedback will go straight to our product team! 🚀

[two-trick-pony-NL]

Hi! We're closing this issue as it's tied to an older version of our SDKs, and we've since completely revamped them as part of bunq Update 28.

This is a fresh start—we've tested the new SDKs extensively, and we’ll be putting them to the test again during our upcoming hackathon this Friday, where we’ll fix idiosyncrasies on the spot. (You’re welcome to join us!)

If this issue (or a new one) shows up with the updated SDKs, feel free to reopen or file a new report—we're happy to jump on it.