Roger Meier

@timowolf Yes, I'm on the same page.. ignore licenses is not what we need. Scratch that proposal! I just had a look at the package.json spec and there is a...

@antoineauger I think we should contribute docs and co. to make it work according to https://amplified.dev/#5-adopt-open-source-interfaces , the maintainers might just be to busy with lot of stuff :construction_worker: :wrench:

@zricethezav I suggest closing this as it is addressed by #1536

@dopry You should adopt the commit message, to e.g. `chore: resolve unmet dependencies` as conventional commit messages are used here. you can verify your message with `npm run changelog`, see...

thanks for the insights @oxr463 ! so the answer to my question https://github.com/CyberNinjas/pam_aad/issues/64 is no and the new home is here? If so it would be cool to have that...

I tried https://launchpad.net/~lramage/+archive/ubuntu/sds today but using focal was a no success. I really have some doubts about using sds and I would love to see pam_aad without that dependency to...

I made https://gitlab.com/oxr463/sds/-/issues/3 regarding sds ppa. Nevertheless, I still believe getting rid of sds is worth to do, getting sds into the distros without ppa is already a huge effort...

@oxr463 Do you plan now to replace sds are shall we prepare a PR?

I was thinking about curl as it is already available on all distros and used by other pam modules as well.

:smile: I'm sorry too busy with other stuff right now! I look into this and come back with a proposal.