Brian Richter
Brian Richter
@mwherman2000 you should use 4.1 million PRs.
And you should have 4.1 million _different_ specifications with implementations. If you're goal isn't just to waste people's time that is 🙂
@TimoGlastra I forgot to mention I was focussing solely on resolver in this PR. I added some of the base stuff for the registrar, which will be coming soon. I'm...
OK, great I will remove the stuff about the registrar. Unfortunately, I don't think that this is 0.3 compatible I can compare the differences and see what would be required...
Hey @TimoGlastra, quick question about verifying Data Integrity proofs in a custom setup. We're building an `AnonCredsRegistry` for `did:webvh` (`WebVhAnonCredsRegistry`). The objects we fetch (schemas, cred defs, etc.) are structured...
@TimoGlastra @genaris this is ready for a review. I have updated the didwebvh-ts package to the new version which supports version 1.0 of the spec and addressed any comments in...
The integration tests probably don't need to be checked in they are testing real resource resolution and those files will likely disappear one day
Thank you @TimoGlastra I believe I addressed all of your comments other than the legacy KMS stuff. Need a bit more help getting that plugged in properly
@TimoGlastra I think this is ready to be looked at again now. Working on a 0.5.x version now
legacy version created in #2339