Brent

@murisi I don't think unshielding and reshielding in order to take advantage of compounding rewards is an issue at all. Anyone is free to do this in proof of stake,...

I'm going to close this, as I think we've decided to forgo this PR, still sound good @murisi? Here's a summary of the motivation for closing (@cwgoes): - There are...

@sug0 what is the status of this PR right now?

@sug0 I don't think that is true. The `source` one must provide is the owner of the bond for which rewards are being claimed - it is typically the user...

@opsecx what do you mean by "four different blocks"? Your list above has 6. Also @opsecx and I chatted for a bit about this the other day, and I'm not...

Mind reaching out on discord to me to help debug? Curious to know your address. @Brent

what's the status of this PR?

Is this considered done or just needs #3394 until it is completed?

do we still want this PR?

This is not a bug but more likely just a limitation of the software in some respect. @Liver-23 It is enforced in Namada's protocol too that tokens that were already...