Brent

@Fraccaman @cwgoes I think this should probably be a Phase 1 priority, what do you think?

@phasewalk1 Can you rebase this PR on the latest release v0.33? Then also make sure to run `make fmt` and `make clippy` to help the CI pass. We would like...

Shouldn't be too difficult, just involves reconstructing the validator sets. Here is a rough general idea: In `finalize_block`, at the beginning of a new epoch, read the value of `max_validator_slots`...

Furthermore, a similar thing may be necessary if the `validator_stake_threshold` is changed, which dictates the other validator set boundary - between the below-capacity and below-threshold sets. However, the size of...

@cwgoes we should decide if this is a Phase 1 milestone or a Later / Optional

Why are you transferring to yourself though? If you transferred to another address (say one that you also owned), you don't see this, correct? You should receive a wasm error...

@banananas1vb I agree, while this does not pose a security vulnerability for Namada (the tx will error with `Insufficient balance` if `source != target`), it does not seem wise to...

do we still want to do this @tzemanovic ?

@murisi @batconjurer @grarco @Fraccaman how relevant is this issue still?

Any chance we could prioritize this, especially for next release? I ask because we have an e2e test `proposal_ibc_token_inflation` that is failing without this, and don't want to be in...