adblock-rust
adblock-rust copied to clipboard
brave
Support other procedural filters
Coming from the post; https://www.reddit.com/r/brave_browser/comments/13lnfky/does_brave_now_fully_support_procedural_filtering/
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Procedural-cosmetic-filters
Currently supporting :has
As of 19/05/2023, Popularity of filters in uBO:
| Filter | Number of filters used |
|---|---|
| has-text | 494 |
| upward | 352 |
| xpath | 49 |
| matches-css | 48 |
| matches-path | 7 |
| matches-media | 3 |
| matches-attr | 2 |
| watch-attr | 1 |
Just noticed that Brave doesn't support has-text. Would be awesome to have that feature!
AdGuard lists use :contains() instead of :has-text(), Brave should support both of them.
Any news on this? Facebook ads (video pages or on mobile) are unblocked by the lack of has-text().
In the mean time one can use "Stylebot" to match and hide elements using CSS matching.
Thanks for the suggestion. However, I’m wondering what can StyleBot do that uBlock can’t, because having to install an extension kind of defeats the purpose of having a built-in adblocker. Specially for my use case, where I wanted to do the blocking on an iPhone on which I can’t install any extensions.
On Aug 23, 2024 at 11:38 PM, <CapSel @.***)> wrote:
In the mean time one can use "Stylebot" to match and hide elements using CSS matching.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub (https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust/issues/293#issuecomment-2307842942), or unsubscribe (https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQMROUBAKLOCZDMN7KN7ADZS6TTXAVCNFSM6AAAAAAYHTBWTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBXHA2DEOJUGI). You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
