fun as function keyword to line up code better

[samuell]

Small pet peeve: I never understood why Rust (not to mention Go) didn't go with fun as the keyword for functions, so that the function name lines up with four space indentation of the code below :blush:

So instead of:

fn main() {
    let reader = bufio.NewReader(os.Stdin)

    rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())
    let secret = rand.Intn(100) + 1
    // ... cont ...

We'd have:

fun main() {
    let reader = bufio.NewReader(os.Stdin)

    rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())
    let secret = rand.Intn(100) + 1
    // ... cont ...

[AbstractiveNord]

If you are extremely careful about that alignment, consider using double spaces:

fn  main() {
    let reader = bufio.NewReader(os.Stdin)

    rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())
    let secret = rand.Intn(100) + 1
    // ... cont ...

I don't recommend both of approaches since fn main() is OK, but you can propose that into fmt tool of Borgo. And don't take it too serious.

[kegsay]

I'm surprised you like that. To me, the alignment trips up my eyes so I see main as part of the function body, which of course it isn't. Having it offset makes line scanning easier in my brain.

[Chu-4hun]

fn - is for functions fun - is not fun