boolafish
boolafish
Ok, that only works when not chaining :(
> I believe that any challenge period specific to role can be exploited by operator impersonating such role. I.e. this does not work in general Can you elaborate the reason...
2/ is not really an issue. If we are using [Kelvin’s construction](https://github.com/omisego/research/blob/master/plasma/simple_fast_withdrawals.md#pay-to-smart-contract), it will need to send the fund to a contract first. The contract would become the “owner” to...
@whoisjeremylam I think we can tweak the construction a bit and do it. First, the "token" is nothing more than a mapping in the contract to be honest. So let's...
Alternative proposed by Karl is to do atomic swap on eth and plasma: [link](https://plasma.build/t/plasma-withdrawal-time-is-a-major-hindrance-to-adoption/66/4?u=boolafish) This comes from the idea to swap with people who wants to deposit.
We would need to know where to exit to though. IDK, AuthenticationScheme would be able to provide where to exit? Previously this info would either be owner or outputGuard.
Instead of introducing new "id" I would probably stick with outputGuard to hold the AuthenticationScheme ID + Authentication contract address. (so using hash instead of reserving bytes for ID) The...
As I commented in the doc, the biggest issue of naively reducing the exit period is how many utxos we can have in the whole network to support mass exit....
btw, I can think of an interesting research topic is that can we have different exit period on different tx type? And what does this implies? But I do agree...