Tierney Cyren

@jkleinsc added that to the checklist above. Also checked off and updated the OpenCollective items since @groundwater updated the "About" section of the Electron OpenCollective with the appropriate paragraph.

Thank you for taking the website work @erickzhao! 🙇 I am not a lawyer so I'd probably not be comfortable asserting that myself, so I've asked Brian Warner who does...

Updated two bullets above with a reference to https://github.com/electron/electronjs.org/pull/3895. I _think_ we can mark them as done and merge once everything is approved.

Final TODOs with owners to drive them: - [ ] Update project CoC reporting methods to include OpenJS Foundation escalation path - @bnb: working on this with the CPC. Does...

> Update project CoC reporting methods to include OpenJS Foundation escalation path Tiny update: I've created an issue in the new CoC WG in the OpenJS GitHub org to address...

Checked a few more off that have been completed for some time. I'm not sure if the logomark was / will be transferred, if the domains will be/were transferred (or...

After following up with Jory, the CoC updates don't need to be done.

> I'm curious what experiences led to the statement 'DCO is annoying and hard.' In practice in the Node.js project, the exact reasoning you point out is the challenge. DCO...

I generally agree with you! > since the contributor only has to add the Signed-off-by line in their commits This specifically is the challenge. The word "only" is doing a...

> @bnb can you expand on this? I would be against a solution that's not 100% automated. > Is that codified in a requirement? Yes, this is what the DCO...