Barry Dorrans
Barry Dorrans
It should be, yes, aside from Razor Pages, but the principles are still the same, it's just a slightly different way to apply policies that they've already documented.
Code signing finally added in https://github.com/blowdart/idunno.Authentication/commit/5e8e195c7ea4efc47f02f88146f13a7ac29f54f8
It would also be an improvement over the OS specific install instructions, it would be pulling in signed nuget packages, and would work with any pipeline that can install .NET
_From @HaoK on November 13, 2017 21:1_ Are you trying to create a new MVC Core application and have it plug into an older Identity 2.2 database?
_From @rvandulek on November 13, 2017 21:20_ No, just a new MVC 5 application (using whatever the current template is in the latest VS 2017). Our existing apps are also...
Moving as this isn't an identity core issue.
Yes. This is why you must have [AllowAnonymous] on your login assets.
Can you provide a code repo, rather than instructions? Unfortunately your instructions don't give version numbers, for MVC, or for VS, nor indicate templates used if any, or your patch...
You'd put it in a public github repo and link to it. You talk about cookie auth, but the default MVC template doesn't have auth in it, which is why...