blag

When I change the filter to: ```python Book.objects.filter(pk=book.pk, published_in__contains=book.published_in) ``` the test passes. ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯

Tests for this would be great, thank you.

I make no promises - I do this all in my own free time and I have plenty of other things going on, as we all do. But tests for...

Thanks for your contribution!

Fixed in #148.

Correct, you can't, you just have to overwrite the list. This package is a bit of a hack, and sometimes M2M fields make more sense for your application.

Fixed in #148.

Correct. This project is a bit of a workaround for non-PostgreSQL users, and ArrayFields would probably be a cleaner solution for PostgreSQL users.

I have some minor questions (still interested in the answers/responses even though I resolved the review comments) but nothing that would merit blocking this. Thank you for your effort.

Closing in favor of #146, since that preserves backwards compatibility. Thank you for your contribution though!