bitcoin
bitcoin copied to clipboard
scripted-diff: Update DeriveType enum values to mention ranged derivations
While reviewing the MuSig2 descriptors PR #31244, I realized that the enum
DeriveType here logically refers to the derive type for ranged descriptors.
This became evident to me while going through the implementations of IsRanged
& IsHardened functions of BIP32PubkeyProvider, and the ParsePubkeyInner
function. Initially I got confused by reading IsRange translating to
!= DeriveType::NO, but later realised it specifically referred to the presence
of ranged derivations. I propose explicitly mentioning "ranged" in the values
of the DeriveType enum would make it easier to parse the descriptors code.
This enum is used in one file only - script/descriptors.cpp. That's why I
explicitly passed it as the argument in the sed command in the script below.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's/HARDENED/HARDENED_RANGED/g' src/script/descriptor.cpp sed -i 's/NO,/NON_RANGED,/g' src/script/descriptor.cpp sed -i 's/DeriveType::NO/DeriveType::NON_RANGED/g' src/script/descriptor.cpp -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
Code Coverage & Benchmarks
For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/32745.
Reviews
See the guideline for information on the review process.
| Type | Reviewers |
|---|---|
| Concept ACK | l0rinc |
| Stale ACK | hodlinator, PeterWrighten |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Conflicts
No conflicts as of last run.
Concept ACK d60b008 It's a good refactoring for understanding, but perhaps you should still check and modify other documents to make sure it would not missing the explanation of this change in them.
Yes, I had confirmed regarding this, and I did add a note in the commit message & the PR description that all these enum values are contained within one file only.
Concept ACK, didn't review it very thoroughly - ping me if you need a full review
Rebased over master to incorporate changes from #31244.