Ben

Thanks @FBruzzesi, comment is really helpful! At the moment, the changes I've made since my initial commit (have squashed the commits together for neatness): - keyword argument of "inner" now...

Well that's embarrassing! Looks like my "neat squashing" was just a "neat deleting a commit" for the validation check removal 🫠 All taken out now.  Ok, I've done some...

Thanks @FBruzzesi that's very helpful! I've made a couple more changes off the basis of that: - Changed the validation to check for order as well as column names matching...

Awesome thanks @FBruzzesi - I've made those changes (as an FYI I also raised an issue with over on dask/dask to check around the expected behaviour for concatenating on `axis=1`...

Just seen this is still open 🥲 any chance one of the maintainers is able to give it a quick once over? It's only type annotations so isn't that complex...

Hey both - thought I'd have a brief investigate, the logic on overriding `npartitions` looks sound (i.e. matching the docs) to me. If you *don't* give a `divisions` keyword, it's...

@sam-goodwin (or anyone else having issues with type hinting) - are there any specific functions causing problems for you aside from `array.rechunk`? I'd be up for spending a little time...