astropy
APE 22 follow-up: Candidates for pyOpenSci trial review period
This has been discussed offline between me and Astropy Editors but in the spirit of transparency, I am going to create a table in this issue listing the currently active applications. As each of them accept or reject this trial period, we collectively need to update this table.
Trial period is as laid out in Step 1 of https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/main/APE22.rst#implementation and https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/main/APE22.rst#the-trial-period .
| Package | PR | Submitter | Editor | Agreed to trial period (✔️ or ❌ ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pypeit | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/436 | @profxj | @hamogu | ❓ |
| PyAutoGalaxy | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/491 | @Jammy2211 | @pllim | ✔️ https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/235 |
| PyAutoLens | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/492 | @Jammy2211 | @dhomeier | ✔️ |
| ZodiPy | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/495 | @MetinSa | @dhomeier | ✔️ https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/161 – accepted 🎉 |
| Pyxel | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/516 | @flemmel | ❓ | ✔️ |
| martini | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/526 | @kyleaoman | @hamogu | ✔️ https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/164 – accepted 🎉 |
| Dolphot_LC | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/527 | @whit5224 | ❓ | ✔️ https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/177 |
| PetroFit | https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com/pull/550 | @robelgeda | @dhomeier | ✔️ https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/159 – accepted 🎉 |
This is a follow up of:
- https://github.com/astropy/astropy-project/issues/334
- https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/pull/87
Editors (fixed ;-) – reviewers are anonymous under the Astropy rules, but would need to waive their anonymity in the new system.
Thank you @kyleaoman, we will contact the current reviewer for your package to determine the next steps.
Summarising some key changes in the process:
- Double open review instead of single anonymous
- additional listing as a pyOpenSci package
- automatic submission for publication in JOSS
- review under the pyOpenSci guidelines in addition to Astropy-specific requirements such as integration into the Astropy ecosystem
- submission and review in the pyOpenSci submission space