ruff
ruff copied to clipboard
`wasm-pack` test is unreliable
See: https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff/actions/runs/3794761527/jobs/6453331265.
What I don't understand - and I noticed that in multiple runs - is why the operation is being canceled. Many times the tests succeeded.
running 3 tests
test ruff::lib_wasm::test::empty_config ... ok
test ruff::lib_wasm::test::partial_config ... ok
test ruff::lib_wasm::test::partial_nested_config ... ok
test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored
Error: The operation was canceled.
Yeah, trying to find any relevant issues etc. but not seeing anything.
I don't know if this is just a symptom of a different failure, but when it fails in this way, we never see the other test suites skip execution:
I'll try setting --lib for now... I dunno.
I'm also seeing this.. which isn't that helpful. I was thinking that maybe it's just being canceled because a new workflow was scheduled, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I would also kinda rule out memory issues, we're not even running headless browsers for testing..
2022-12-28T15:22:07.1731677Z running 3 tests
2022-12-28T15:22:07.1831067Z
2022-12-28T15:22:07.2165473Z test ruff::lib_wasm::test::empty_config ... ok
2022-12-28T15:22:07.2217990Z test ruff::lib_wasm::test::partial_config ... ok
2022-12-28T15:22:07.2433964Z test ruff::lib_wasm::test::partial_nested_config ... ok
2022-12-28T15:22:07.2457576Z
2022-12-28T15:22:07.2459785Z test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored
2022-12-28T15:22:07.2460027Z
2022-12-28T15:22:41.4902290Z ##[error]Process completed with exit code 143.
2022-12-28T15:22:41.4984194Z ##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
Well, actually.. when you start searching for the "shutdown signal" thing, numerous issues popup about people's jobs being canceled. Most often due to resource limits.
For example: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/6680 One response: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/6680#issuecomment-1335778010
I don't remember having seen this in months.