[ISSUE #8755] batch send support compression

[iamgd67]

closes #8755

Brief Description

by default, DefaultMQProducer will compress message body when body length is longer than 4k, but if send with batch(send( Collection<Message> msgs)), body are not compressed. this pr compress each message body when average length is larger than 4k

How Did You Test This Change?

send and receive batch messages with 8k body(larger than 4k default compress length), check commit log content is compressed. consume message body is 8k length.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 57.89474% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.37%. Comparing base (551c8c3) to head (156b9dd). Report is 84 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...mq/client/impl/producer/DefaultMQProducerImpl.java	73.07%	4 Missing and 3 partials :warning:
...apache/rocketmq/common/message/MessageDecoder.java	33.33%	5 Missing and 1 partial :warning:
.../apache/rocketmq/test/factory/ConsumerFactory.java	0.00%	3 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #8746      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      47.40%   47.37%   -0.04%     
+ Complexity     11568    11553      -15     
=============================================
  Files           1282     1282              
  Lines          89864    89890      +26     
  Branches       11563    11568       +5     
=============================================
- Hits           42603    42587      -16     
- Misses         42020    42048      +28     
- Partials        5241     5255      +14     

Flag	Coverage Δ
	47.37% <57.89%> (-0.01%)	:arrow_down:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[iamgd67]

ping @lizhimins for review

[iamgd67]

ping @RongtongJin for review

[lizhanhui]

1. An integration test, verifying this feature from end-to-end, should be added.

[iamgd67]

@lizhanhui integration test added and passed

[iamgd67]

ping @lollipopjin for review

[iamgd67]

ping @RongtongJin for review

[iamgd67]

@RongtongJin @fuyou001 @tianliuliu @lollipopjin @lizhanhui please review this， thanks.

[iamgd67]

@RongtongJin @fuyou001 @tianliuliu @lollipopjin @lizhanhui please review this， thanks.

[iamgd67]

anyone care?