[ISSUE #4634] fix code style in namesrv module

[PansonPanson]

[PansonPanson]

Hi @PansonPanson ,

Great job. Glad to see more and more developers get to pay attention to our code style. Please checkout CI and fix its errors.

fixed~ in accordance with mq_checkstyle.xml

2. white space

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #4635 (876aab2) into develop (244959c) will decrease coverage by 0.19%. The diff coverage is 11.11%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #4635      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      43.30%   43.10%   -0.20%     
+ Complexity      7701     7675      -26     
=============================================
  Files            994      994              
  Lines          68939    68927      -12     
  Branches        9132     9130       -2     
=============================================
- Hits           29853    29711     -142     
- Misses         35341    35481     +140     
+ Partials        3745     3735      -10     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...va/org/apache/rocketmq/namesrv/NamesrvStartup.java	16.80% <0.00%> (+0.14%)	:arrow_up:
...che/rocketmq/namesrv/kvconfig/KVConfigManager.java	64.13% <0.00%> (+3.92%)	:arrow_up:
...tmq/namesrv/processor/DefaultRequestProcessor.java	60.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...c/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/common/MixAll.java	44.23% <40.00%> (-0.36%)	:arrow_down:
...a/org/apache/rocketmq/store/StoreStatsService.java	39.22% <0.00%> (-10.50%)	:arrow_down:
...apache/rocketmq/store/queue/ConsumeQueueStore.java	53.41% <0.00%> (-5.56%)	:arrow_down:
...e/rocketmq/store/ha/autoswitch/EpochFileCache.java	77.08% <0.00%> (-4.17%)	:arrow_down:
...ketmq/common/protocol/body/ConsumerConnection.java	95.83% <0.00%> (-4.17%)	:arrow_down:
...mq/store/ha/autoswitch/AutoSwitchHAConnection.java	71.11% <0.00%> (-3.82%)	:arrow_down:
...a/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/BrokerController.java	43.84% <0.00%> (-3.52%)	:arrow_down:
... and 23 more

:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 48.463% when pulling 2fcb3990bfda82c9c4448bd13ee2799eb8bd9aef on PansonPanson:develop into efbc4a1fccd2e79b339ee2e6da7695a03eb31139 on apache:develop.

[PansonPanson]

Hi @PansonPanson ,

Great job. Glad to see more and more developers get to pay attention to our code style. Please checkout CI and fix its errors.

ci build passed

[lizhanhui]

@PansonPanson Hi, could you push an empty commit to trigger the CI again? The CI infra has evolved and it expects new pass results to merge this pull request.

[lizhanhui]

@PansonPanson Hi, could you push an empty commit to trigger the CI again? The CI infra has evolved and it expects new pass results to merge this pull request.

[PansonPanson]

@lizhanhui I just merged develop into the current branch, but tests failed. Is the remote server healthy?

[aaron-ai]

@PansonPanson Failure of bazel build has been resolved, could you rebase the develop branch again?

[PansonPanson]

@aaron-ai create a new PR ，see https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/5159.