plc4x
plc4x copied to clipboard
Add more tests for mspec parser and code generator.
as of a668321 this doesnt even build on java :/
ok I think I was on the wrong revision e5d1782... nvm
@splatch please rebase on current main
@splatch careful that you leave it as readAManual field otherwise we have lang collisions in Goland
also it seems you reverted stuff by accident with the rebase, not sure why dad got deleted :D
as a small background why I used non-technical terms: When you debug that stuff and you stumble over structs named struct it is getting pretty confusing. So the goal there was to avoid to use the codegen terms so it is easier to seperate content from codegen items.
I was sure that this A was a typo! I will try to pull back commit from reflog and cherry pick it on top of develop.
no worries, just from the looks of it it looks like a failed rebase/merge :)
Afaik this should be the only change in that PR
maybe the other one above but not sure. Think I got rid of it because of the confusion
but if you added that feel free to readd
@sruehl I've cherry picked only intended changes, should be better now.