Aristotle Pagaltzis

Then what do you want to do? Colourise… what, the inside of the entire block? That will produce an ugly colour highlight block with jagged edges at the top and...

Sorry I missed this issue entirely. There is no such feature currently. There are requests for several related features that so far I’ve not accepted, for reasons outlined in #8...

Mainly `user_buffers` filters out unlisted buffers. The point of the function is to get the list of buffers that actually represent something the user is editing – without the special-purpose...

I might take this one. Still debating whether taking it will prevent me from being able to make other changes later that I may want. I tend to think that...

Well, it depends. If the idea is to have a feature to say “highlight me this bit of an otherwise non-highlighted buffer”, then yes, that’s not something I feel like...

You can avoid having to convert to hex, at least, by turning on CSS expression parsing: ````vim :call css_color#init('css','none','') ```` … and just copy-pasting to a comment: ````c point =...

So what is your case? Whether colour keywords are highlighted (and which ones) already varies: it’s based on the filetype.

Thanks for the feedback. That doesn’t sound like a use case to me, though? To me that’s just a bug. The plugin is syntax-sensitive specifically to keep from highlighting things...

I’ll take a look. You can make this easier for me by providing me an example file in the style of the `tests/example.*` files, with a few examples of all...

So based on the README at [postcss/sugarss](/postcss/sugarss) I pasted the following into `tests/example.sss`: ```` a color: blue .multiline, .selector box-shadow: 1px 0 9px rgba(0, 0, 0, .4), 1px 0 3px...